This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
mission:log:2014:11:04:howto-setup-use-and-secure-a-local-spark-cloud-server [2014-11-13 19:54] – [OTA firmware update] chrono | mission:log:2014:11:04:howto-setup-use-and-secure-a-local-spark-cloud-server [2016-09-02 19:19] (current) – [HOWTO: Set up and secure a local Spark-Core Cloud] chrono | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
//Do we really want to give out our complete sensory data (sys/ | //Do we really want to give out our complete sensory data (sys/ | ||
- | Some people may haven' | + | Some people may haven' |
- | In the year 2014, in a post [[http:// | + | In the year 2014, in a post [[http:// |
The current software implementation (firmware- and server-side) has no concept of mesh/p2p or direct networking/ | The current software implementation (firmware- and server-side) has no concept of mesh/p2p or direct networking/ | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | When you follow this howto and secure your network access with a strong VPN you'll end up with something that looks like this image, where we effectively mitigate all these issues and take back control of our privacy & autonomy. At least we now can decide if and which data we want to share and publish. | + | When you follow this howto and secure your network access with a strong VPN ([[https:// |
==== Key Features/ | ==== Key Features/ | ||
Line 515: | Line 515: | ||
Depending on your state of mind, you might perceive this as paranoid but I can guarantee you, this has nothing to do with paranoia in any way, neither should this be perceived as a rant against spark-core or Amazon Web Services for that matter. Amazon Web Services is just the cloud provider used by spark.io and therefore got mentioned because it is so. What applies here applies to any other cloud platform one could choose, in general. From a business standpoint of view the decision to put things into a AWS seems absolutely valid to me. Of course, it's a little more expensive when you crunch the numbers but in return you get the full orchestra of AWS products, which in my experience do a good job working together, route53, elb, multiple geolocations and the whole shabang. And you can react very quickly to changes in demand of requests. In a perfect world, I would just use it as it is, because the setup isn't bad when we consider bandwidth not a problem. But when government agencies run haywire and military/ | Depending on your state of mind, you might perceive this as paranoid but I can guarantee you, this has nothing to do with paranoia in any way, neither should this be perceived as a rant against spark-core or Amazon Web Services for that matter. Amazon Web Services is just the cloud provider used by spark.io and therefore got mentioned because it is so. What applies here applies to any other cloud platform one could choose, in general. From a business standpoint of view the decision to put things into a AWS seems absolutely valid to me. Of course, it's a little more expensive when you crunch the numbers but in return you get the full orchestra of AWS products, which in my experience do a good job working together, route53, elb, multiple geolocations and the whole shabang. And you can react very quickly to changes in demand of requests. In a perfect world, I would just use it as it is, because the setup isn't bad when we consider bandwidth not a problem. But when government agencies run haywire and military/ | ||
- | {{tag> | + | {{tag> |
- | {{keywords> | + | {{keywords> |
~~DISCUSSION~~ | ~~DISCUSSION~~ | ||